STBBI Research - Ayel L. R. Batac
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED AND BLOOD-BORNE INFECTIONS
\(~\)
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) remain a major global public health concern. Despite increasing awareness, testing rates for STIs—such as gonorrhea and chlamydia—remain low worldwide, especially among marginalized populations including men who have sex with men (MSM). The underdiagnosis of asymptomatic infections continues to pose a barrier to effective treatment and control.
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), multiple factors such as stigma, financial costs, and limited access to culturally sensitive services reduce uptake of testing. In East Asian contexts, MSM often face structural exclusion and high levels of stigma, limiting their engagement with formal health systems and contributing to gaps in prevention and care.
\(~\)
Ongoing Research
My current work involves the evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the pay-it-forward strategy among MSM in China. This includes:
Assessing STI testing uptake across different behavioural intervention arms
Analyzing giving behaviours as markers of engagement and reciprocity
Identifying clinic-level and demographic factors that influence outcomes
Testing a digital version of the PIF model integrated with self-sampling to improve accessibility in low-resource settings
This research contributes to growing efforts to understand how social innovation and behavioural science can strengthen public health responses to STBBIs by expanding testing reach, building community resilience, and reframing how health systems engage with stigmatized populations.
Methodological Approach
To fully understand both the impact and implementation of the PIF model, this research uses a mixed methods design:
Quantitative evaluation through randomized controlled trials tracks behavioural outcomes, including uptake and donation patterns
Qualitative interviews with participants and providers explore perceived barriers, motivations for giving, and emotional responses to the intervention
Process evaluations assess feasibility, fidelity, and scalability in real-world settings
This integration of methods helps generate both rigorous evidence and context-specific insights that are essential for scale-up and adaptation.
Contribution to Public Health
This research contributes to reimagining STI testing as a more equitable, effective, and empowering element of public health delivery. Key public health contributions include:
Demonstrating how decentralized, community-driven financing models can sustainably expand access to essential services
Advancing stigma-sensitive, culturally tailored approaches to testing that are attuned to the lived experiences of MSM and other marginalized groups
Informing health system strategies that align social innovation with service delivery, helping to bridge the gap between clinic-based care and community realities
Contributing to global conversations on universal health coverage, equity, and the integration of sexual health into broader public health systems
By positioning STI testing as a collective act of care—rather than an individual burden—this research helps build a more inclusive foundation for sexual health equity.
\(~\)
\(~\)
Stay tuned — publications and data visualizations related to this work will be made available here soon.
Social Innovation in Action: What Is the Pay-It-Forward Model?
The pay-it-forward (PIF) model is a social innovation approach that blends public health delivery with prosocial behaviour. In the context of STI testing, PIF offers individuals a free service—such as testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia—and then invites them to support someone else’s access through voluntary donations or encouraging messages.
The model is built on three core pillars:
Access: Removing cost barriers to testing
Altruism: Harnessing the human tendency to give back after receiving support
Community engagement: Fostering collective responsibility for health and well-being
Unlike traditional models of subsidized or fee-for-service health care, PIF decentralizes financial burden while embedding a sense of solidarity and empowerment. It is especially valuable in contexts where stigma, mistrust of institutions, or cost inhibits access to care.